I apologise in advance, I feel like this story is a bit all over the place. But I’m still reeling from the injustice of the Ceasefire deal. Incensed that innocent hostages are being used as bargaining chips. That Israel has achieved so much, but are still being held over a barrel. I’m furious that the world is pressuring Israel to agree to a Ceasefire when they SHOULD be pressuring Hamas to Give Back the Hostages. Some days it all seems too much. The shining light of course, it the possibility of some of the hostages coming home — but it SHOULD be every single one of them.
But still, I want to continue to spotlight the reckless hypocrisy that progressive feminists have displayed regarding Israeli women. I have used home grown examples, but I know that there are equally abhorrent ‘feminists’ world-wide that deserve the same level of condemnation.
Am Yisrael Chai.
What are the signs that a society or a group of individuals have become radicalised? Behavioural traits will often include spending an increasing amounts of time talking to people with extreme views, changing a style of dress or personal appearance (like keffiyehs, extremist tees), and they will often lose interest in friends and activities that are not associated with the extremist ideology, group or cause. Sounds familiar?
Today’s polarisation and radicalisation can be explained through epistemic bubbles and echo chambers, which effectively cut of any opposing views or arguments through invisible algorithms, leading to a constant validation source of what can often be very dangerous ideas.
This would explain, but not justify the abhorrent reaction from self proclaimed feminists in reaction to the systematic violent rape and abuse of women in Israel last October. The voracity of the war crimes committed on that day were of a level hard to comprehend, but there is no doubt that they happened.

People involved in collecting and identifying the bodies of those killed in the attack told of systematic signs of sexual assault, including broken pelvises, bruises, cuts and tears, and that the victims ranged from children and teenagers to pensioners.1
What they lacked in first account testimony due to almost all of the victims being dead, gaps were filled in with witnesses, first responders and of course the rapists own videos. Once such survivor testified seeing Hamas fighters gang rape a woman and mutilate her, before the last of her attackers shot her in the head while he continued to rape her.2
"She was alive," the witness says. "She was bleeding from her back." She goes on to detail how the men cut off parts of the victim's body during the assault. "They sliced her breast and threw it on the street…"
In the video, the woman known as Witness S mimes the attackers picking up and passing the victim from one to another. "She was alive," the witness says. "She was bleeding from her back." She goes on to detail how the men cut off parts of the victim's body during the assault. "They sliced her breast and threw it on the street," she says. "They were playing with it. The victim was passed to another man in uniform. He penetrated her, and shot her in the head before he finished. He didn't even pick up his pants; he shoots and ejaculates."
Even the United Nations — who is no friend of Israel — begrudgingly had to admit in a report that “There are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence — including rape and gang-rape — occurred across multiple locations of Israel and the Gaza periphery during the attacks on 7 October 2023.”3
It’s hard to fathom that any woman, any human in fact, let alone one proclaiming to have the interests of women as their manifesto, could be so dismissive, even outright aggressive to the plight of Israeli women — but here we are.
Israeli attorney Moran Gaz recently discussed in an interview how difficult it has been to prosecute any of the sexual crimes that took place on October 7. Due to the sheer numbers of victims, Gaz goes on to explain; “The biggest challenge is evidence. Linking specific crimes to specific suspects, across dozens of crime scenes involving hundreds of suspects and thousands of offenses, is nearly impossible. "Standard rules of evidence don’t fit this situation. There are no organized chains of evidence, and there’s no one to verify the videos you want to present in court.”4
The staggering scope of the slaughter of October 7 meant that it was difficult to the even identify the vast number of bodies let alone perform extensive autopsies on them. As is also common in war, collection of physical evidence is hindered by ongoing combat and a large, chaotic crime scene — and in this case by Jewish burial traditions.
Most of the victims of the atrocities were dead, and those that survived are so traumatised, that they have been so far unwilling to deal with the second hand trauma of coming forward to be re-victimised. And who could blame them, with feminists world-wide ready to pounce.
Despite the mountains of evidence and reports to the contrary, feminist influencers like Clementine Ford and Constance Hall and hoards of other ‘progressives’ repeatedly distorted, misquoted or simply denied the words of both the victims, first responders, the United Nations and now the words of Moran Gaz, with self-righteous smug indignation.
In response to Gaz’s interview, Ford gleefully reposted,a story claiming “No rape allegations filed in October 7th case, Israeli prosecutor admits.”
Ford’s comment? And there it is.

How smart and victorious you must feel Clementine Ford, so self-righteous and smug in your confidence to shove it to those Israeli women. Did your feminist senses start tingling with joy when you typed in that ripper statement?
And there it is.
Except you are wrong. Women were raped, abused and mutilated — as even the most cursory side-step out of your epistemic bubble would show you, if you were willing. But instead what we have is your repugnant prevarication and denial of some of the most horrific degradation and sexual violence perpetrated against women in modern times. Take a bow feminist warrior!.
And course, the clip that Ford reposted is factually incorrect. If Ford had bothered to listen to the interview, she would have gleaned that it’s very difficult to get testimony from dead witnesses. And near impossible to identity rapists from a neighbouring region when the governing power of the region is a violent, terrorist group that sees the rape of innocent women as ‘resistance.’
But ‘feminists’ like Ford either don’t care about the truth, or they have become so entrenched in their own confirmation bias — that reason, research or even a smidge of empathy for someone outside their bubble has become impossible.
Constance Hall is another Australian woman that has built a successful platform on the back of feminism. Yet Hall too has fallen victim to extremist propaganda rife on social media. Hall proudly reposted an instagram post which stated, “The October 7 Mass Rape has been proven to be a hoax after 15 months.”
Unfortunately Hall too failed to read past the catchy headline. It never stated any such thing. Constance, I know you aren’t the smartest cookie in the jar, but surely even you can understand that it’s hard to file an allegation if you can’t identity the perpetrator. And where should they file the said allegations, with the Palestinian Authority? With Hamas? Yet you are so comfortable sitting on the other end of your smart phone, sniggering at even the idea that Israeli women suffered brutal assaults at the hand of misogynistic terrorist men. You sided with the men.
“Yet how many times was I called anti feminist or had the phrase ‘believe women, unless their 'Izrealee’ [sic] thrown at me by the freaks desperate to justify their murder lust.” - Constance Hall
I guess not all women who wear feminist tees are actually feminists.
Magdalena Wojcieszak, a professor of communication at the University of California, when discussing the dangers of radicalisation from echo chambers explained; “It makes you more extreme or polarized. It reinforces your attitudes. It also reinforces your sense of belonging to this group, and it reinforces your negativity and hostility toward other groups. You think you’re the legitimate one, the good one, the virtuous one. The others are evil.”
Propaganda through social media is being used as tool to demonise and victimise the victims, and influencers are the conduits used to spread the hate and lies.
So what responsibility do these ‘influencers’ with hundreds of thousands of follower have to tell the truth? Clementine Ford a few days ago posted an image of a child ‘amputee’ with the caption “Videos like these are why I cannot tolerate Zionist whining about their right to be shown compassion,” except the video had nothing to do with Gaza, and even less to do with Zionists. This beautiful child is from Brazil, has a popular instagram account at @willianfreitasb and was born without his limbs.
I cannot think of anything more reprehensible than misappropriating an image of a child — without any source checking — to use as ammunition to disparage a group of people that have suffered an unimaginable tragedy.
Should there be repercussions when influencers post lies and untruths to hundreds of thousands if not millions of followers? At what point do we acknowledge the harm to society that these falsehoods undoubtedly cause.
I hope that in time, like the evolution of legacy media, we will progress to a more accountable publishing model on social media. We cannot confuse free speech with hate speech. Having a large audience should come with great responsibility, or at the very least, source verification.
Right now, it’s a free-for-all. A veritable shit-show. In an era where we have access to more information than we ever had, concentration spans are at an all time low. Young consumers are more likely to get their news and information sources from TikTok and Instagram, in 30 seconds bites or less, than anywhere else.

So how do we avoid becoming a victim to our own echo chamber? Social media algorithms are designed to maximise engagement, so extremism is baked into the system. Unsurprisingly, this keeps us locked in distorted bubbles, resulting in polarisation on a societal level. But there is a simple fix.
Ironically, it’ not that difficult. Critically analyse what you read, and verify from multiple sources — you can’t believe everything you see or read on social media.
When something is presented to you, ask yourself these three questions:
Who is behind the information?
What is the evidence?
What do other sources say?5
And maybe, just maybe you will stop yourself from falling into a deep pit of hypocrisy with your self aggrandising, baseless and reckless posts that vilify and denigrate the exact same group of female victims that you profess to stand for.
Just a thought.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67629181
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67629181
https://press.un.org/en/2024/sc15621.doc.htm
https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/yokra14200599
https://www.poynter.org/tfcn/2023/echo-chambers-how-theyre-created-and-how-to-avoid-them/
I don’t think they are misinformed. They just hate Jews and by claiming these atrocities are lies they have the veneer of respectability. They can claim they are supporting the “oppressed” Palestinians as cover for their lethality. We know this is the case because their only connection to Palestinians is their antipathy towards Jews. To me it’s glaringly obvious.
Thank you so much for this, Kelli. CF and CH make me sick to my stomach. I can't bear to think about the number of people (mostly young women) they've grossly misinformed and turned into antisemites over the past 15 months - under the guise of being 'feminists' and 'humanitarians' and caring about 'minorities'. This is EXACTLY how the German people were brainwashed in the 1930s leading up to the... well, you know. A Hella Cost!